Where to download music private torrent tracker

rushbrookrathbone.co.uk frontpage (logged in) on 18 October
Private BitTorrent tracker
Owner	Alan Ellis (aka Oink)
Created&#;by	Oink (Modified TBSource)
Revenue	Voluntary donations
URL	rushbrookrathbone.co.uk or rushbrookrathbone.co.uk
Registration	Free, Invitation only
Launched	30&#;May [1]
Current&#;status	Tracker forcibly shut down

Oink's Pink Palace (frequently stylized as OiNK) was a prominent BitTorrent tracker which operated from to Following a two-year investigation by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) and the British Phonographic Industry (BPI), the site was shut down on 23 October , by British and Dutch police agencies. These music industry organisations described OiNK as an "online pirate pre-release music club", whereas former users described it as one of the world's largest and most meticulously maintained online music repositories.^[2] About a month before the shut-down, music magazine Blender elected OiNK's creator, British software engineer Alan Ellis, to their The Powergeek 25 — the Most Influential People in Online Music list.^[3] Alan Ellis was tried for conspiracy to defraud at TeessideCrown court, the first person in the UK to be prosecuted for illegal file-sharing, and found not guilty on 15 January ^[4]

Background[edit]

OiNK was an invitation-onlyBitTorrent community, with about ,&#;members. When closed by the authorities, the site had stored about ,&#;torrent files.^[5] One of OiNK's rules was that users could not pay to gain membership to the site, but had an opportunity to donate money to the site. Members were required to maintain minimum upload-to-download ratios, and to have cuteavatars.^[2]

OiNK placed an emphasis on the sharing of torrents for high-quality MP3 and lossless audio formats such as FLAC, along with other formats such as Ogg Vorbis and M4A. The torrents for E-books, computer software, and e-learning videos were also routinely shared amongst OiNK's users.

Shut-down and media response[edit]

OiNK's main page immediately after closure

Following a joint operation codenamed Operation Ark Royal, between Interpol, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), the British Phonographic Industry (BPI), and some other organisations, on 23&#;October the site was closed.^[6][7] The site's creator, Alan Ellis, was arrested by British police, and Dutch police confiscated OiNK's hosting service company NForce's servers. The e-mail addresses of the site's members were not encrypted and were therefore available to the authorities; however, members' passwords were only stored as a saltedmd5hash. Data stored on OiNK's servers was insufficient to incriminate OiNK users.^[8][9][10]

Jeremy Banks, head of the IFPI's Internet Anti-Piracy Unit, opined that OiNK was central to the illegal distribution of pre-release music, and that the site had leaked over 60&#;major album releases in ^[5] The shut-down was covered in media worldwide mainly based on IFPI, BPI and Cleveland Police's press releases and original BBC news footage of the arrest of Ellis.^[11]

The British and Dutch Pirate Parties issued a joint statement condemning the actions as retaliatory, questioning the ethics of choreographing it and letting representatives of the alleged victims participate in the investigation.^[12]

In the days following the arrest, when news sources like Wired,^[2]The Guardian,^[13] and rushbrookrathbone.co.uk^[14] started fact checking based on internet sources,^[15] it was revealed that not everything reported in the mainstream media was entirely correct. Common errors quoted by media were: that OiNK was an extremely lucrative website and made hundreds of thousands of pounds from "donations",^[7] which users had to pay to be able to download; that users had to offer new content to the site in order to get invitations;^[16] and that the site was centered around the release of pre-released material.^[5] The first two claims clearly conflicted with the site's written rules and conventions. A counterargument for the third was that only a tiny portion of the site's content was pre-released material. TechCrunch wrote that while links to pre-release albums definitely appeared on OiNK early it was unlikely that the site's members were actually responsible for these releases and claim this shows how poorly the scene is understood.^[17]

After OiNK was raided, several new BitTorrent Trackers were set up by former members of the site.^[18]

Legal proceedings[edit]

Between 23 and 28 May six former members were arrested and questioned, but released on bail without being charged.^[19][20]

On 12&#;September five of the six members of OiNK who had previously been arrested were charged with copyright infringement. The sixth, OiNK's administrator Alan Ellis, had bail extended four times until 10 September , when he was finally charged with conspiracy to defraud. A hearing was held at a magistrates' court on 24 September ^[21]

On 24 September Ellis's case, along with the case of one of the former OiNK members charged with copyright infringement, were referred to the Crown Court sitting at Middlesbrough, with the next hearing scheduled for 2 October but the conspiracy to defraud case was adjourned until 14 November at Teesside Crown Court.^[22] It was then adjourned again until 12 December, then 23 March , then 15 May , and once again until 25 September ^[23]

In December four of the former OiNK members pleaded guilty at Teesside Crown Court, where they were charged with copyright infringement offences. Three were sentenced to a total of hours of community service and court costs of £ each; the other fined £^[24] A further defendant, also charged with a copyright infringement offence, pleaded not guilty and was set for trial along with the administrator of the site, Alan Ellis.^[25]

On 15&#;January Ellis was found not guilty of conspiracy to defraud, with the jury returning a unanimous verdict.^[4] Ellis was represented by Morgan Rose, with Alex Stein as the barrister.^[22]

The CPS took the decision to continue the prosecution against the final OiNK defendant, Matthew Wyatt, despite their failure to secure a conviction against Ellis. The matter was due to proceed to trial but, at the eleventh hour, the CPS decided to drop the case entirely. Commentary at the time suggested that this was in an effort to shield the International Federation of Phonographic Industries and the British Phonographic Industry from explaining the methods by which they secured the evidence against Wyatt, as well as the practices of the music industry in general.^[26] Wyatt was represented by David Cook of Burrows Bussin.^[27] Cook would later go on to successfully represent one of the defendants from the popular FileSoup forum, acquitted of similar allegations in March David Cook later moved to Manchester-based firm Pannone Solicitors, and defends clients in cyber crime prosecutions nationally.^[28][29]

Notable users[edit]

OiNK's user-base included several musicians, most notably Trent Reznor, founder of Nine Inch Nails.^[30] In a interview, Reznor said "I'll admit I had an account there and frequented it quite often. At the end of the day, what made Oink a great place was that it was like the world's greatest record store. Pretty much anything you could ever imagine, it was there, and it was there in the format you wanted. If Oink cost anything, I would certainly have paid, but there isn't the equivalent of that in the retail space right now."^[31] Of the site's member's, Reznor opined, "They're not stealing it because they're going to make money off of it; they're stealing it because they love the band." Reznor also criticised legal music download sites such as iTunes, due to "DRM, low bit rate, etc."^[30] Reznor later worked for legal music services Beats and then Apple Music, saying of the latter "It’s kind of a miracle to think that a device in your pocket can play pretty much any song that the world has ever created."^[32]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

External links[edit]